Yeah, I guess you're right. I wrote it the way you suggested initially, but it didn't work with the flow.
Sure, the flow is better the first way. But it's too grammatically wrong to stay as it is, unfortunately.
Even better is:
* Since then he has been beaten, spat at and had bottles thrown at him. *
Yes, this is the best version.
I'd change the syntax in favour of rhythm... or you trip and lose some punch.
"Since then he has been beaten, spat at, hit by bottles...."
A good version as well.
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
Yeah, I guess you're right. I wrote it the way you suggested initially, but it didn't work with the flow.
Sure, the flow is better the first way. But it's too grammatically wrong to stay as it is, unfortunately.
Even better is:
* Since then he has been beaten, spat at and had bottles thrown at him. *
Yes, this is the best version.
I'd change the syntax in favour of rhythm... or you trip and lose some punch.
"Since then he has been beaten, spat at, hit by bottles...."
A good version as well.